<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response to James</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pedablogy.stevegreenlaw.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pedablogy.stevegreenlaw.org/?p=209</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner Writes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What if the problem is not pedagogy, but profession?</title>
		<link>http://pedablogy.stevegreenlaw.org/?p=209&#038;cpage=1#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner Writes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What if the problem is not pedagogy, but profession?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerryslezak.net/pedablogy/?p=209#comment-422</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting conversation over at Steve&#8217;s Pedablogy site on what enables risk, and why teaching is such a walled garden even inside the university.  Rodney Brooks likes to take assumptions and negate them, so in that spirit and to play devil&#8217;s advocate, what if the problem is not that people aren&#8217;t thinking well about their teaching? What if the problem is that people aren&#8217;t thinking well about their professional work? Working on narrow topics and publishing things of interest to only a few could be a succinct definition of much of the blogosphere. What&#8217;s the difference? Why blog anyway? How do we get a &#8220;blogosphere&#8221; out of all the &#8220;b&#8221; blogs? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting conversation over at Steve&#8217;s Pedablogy site on what enables risk, and why teaching is such a walled garden even inside the university.  Rodney Brooks likes to take assumptions and negate them, so in that spirit and to play devil&#8217;s advocate, what if the problem is not that people aren&#8217;t thinking well about their teaching? What if the problem is that people aren&#8217;t thinking well about their professional work? Working on narrow topics and publishing things of interest to only a few could be a succinct definition of much of the blogosphere. What&#8217;s the difference? Why blog anyway? How do we get a &#8220;blogosphere&#8221; out of all the &#8220;b&#8221; blogs? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
